Why in News
-
India’s health insurance schemes (PMJAY and SHIPs) are expanding coverage to over 80% of the population
-
Debate:
-
Critics argue insurance-driven models strengthen for-profit healthcare
-
Public health infrastructure is neglected
-
Concerns over sustainability and equity
-
Background: Universal Health Care in India
-
UHC Vision
-
Recommended by Bhore Committee (1946)
-
Goal: comprehensive, accessible healthcare for all
-
-
Current Reality
-
Eight decades later, UHC remains distant
-
Insurance schemes (PMJAY, SHIPs) cover many but systemic gaps remain
-
Growth of Health Insurance in India
-
Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY)
-
Launched: 2018
-
Coverage: ₹5 lakh per household per year for inpatient care
-
Population covered: 58.8 crore (2023–24)
-
-
State Health Insurance Programmes (SHIPs)
-
Most states run parallel schemes
-
Budget: ~₹16,000 crore
-
Coverage similar to PMJAY
-
-
Combined Expenditure
-
Around ₹28,000 crore annually (2018–2024)
-
Growth: 8–25% per year in real terms
-
-
Utilisation Gap
-
Only 35% of insured hospital patients used the schemes (HCES 2022–23)
-
Fault Lines in Health Insurance Expansion
-
For-Profit Medicine Bias
-
Two-thirds of PMJAY funds go to private hospitals
-
Leads to commercialisation, unnecessary procedures, ethical issues
-
-
Neglect of Primary Care
-
Insurance focuses on hospitalisation
-
Primary and preventive health services underfunded
-
Ageing population raises tertiary care costs, crowding out PHCs and OPDs
-
-
Utilisation Challenges
-
Beneficiaries unaware of scheme use
-
Private hospitals reluctant due to low reimbursements
-
Disadvantaged groups face barriers
-
-
Discrimination in Care
-
Public hospitals favour insured patients (extra funds)
-
Private hospitals favour uninsured patients (higher bills)
-
Results in inequity
-
-
Financial Sustainability & Provider Exit
-
Pending PMJAY dues: ₹12,161 crore (more than budget)
-
600+ hospitals exited due to delays
-
-
Fraud & Corruption
-
3,200 hospitals flagged for fraud
-
Issues: ghost patients, inflated bills, unnecessary surgeries
-
Weak audits and poor transparency
-
Structural Risks for UHC
-
Underfunded Public Health
-
India: 1.3% of GDP (2022) vs global average 6.1%
-
-
Profit-Driven System
-
Insurance boosts private sector dominance
-
-
High Out-of-Pocket Expenditure
-
Still among the highest globally despite insurance
-
International Comparisons
-
Thailand, Canada
-
Insurance part of UHC with:
-
Non-profit providers
-
Universal coverage
-
Strong regulation
-
-
-
India’s Difference
-
Insurance is targeted, profit-oriented, weakly regulated
-
Way Forward
-
Strengthen Public Health Infrastructure
-
Expand PHCs, diagnostics, OPDs
-
Increase rural health workforce
-
Emphasise preventive care
-
-
Regulate Private Sector
-
Enforce standard treatment protocols
-
Price caps on services
-
Strict monitoring of empanelled hospitals
-
-
Improve Utilisation & Awareness
-
Community outreach and digital literacy
-
Simplified claims and grievance systems
-
-
Financial Sustainability
-
Ensure timely reimbursement
-
Explore direct budgetary allocations instead of intermediaries
-
-
Towards True UHC
-
Raise public health spending to 2.5% of GDP (NHP 2017 target)
-
Shift from insurance-driven approach to publicly funded universal healthcare
-
Conclusion
-
PMJAY and SHIPs give temporary relief but risk creating a hospitalisation-heavy, profit-driven system
-
True UHC requires:
-
Strong public investment in primary care
-
Effective regulation of private providers
-
Equity-focused reforms
-
-
Without these, health insurance works only as a painkiller, not a cure, for India’s healthcare challenges